Radiographic Evaluation of Congenital and Acquired Foot Deformities: Meary's Angle

Purpose

Characterization of congenital and acquired foot deformities on radiographs

Tag(s)

Bilateral foot, foot, x-rays, radiographs, congenital foot, pes, feed, Meary's angle, weight-bearing, talus-first metatarsal angle, MT

Panel

Pediatrics

Define-AI ID

22010017

Originator

Pediatrics Panel

Lead
Viet Le, Alex Towbin 

Panel Chair

Steve Blumer

Panel Reviewers

Pediatrics Panel

License

Creative Commons 4.0

Status Public Comment
RadElement Set  RDES244
                               

Clinical Implementation


Value Proposition

Multiple angles and measurements can be used to evaluate abnormal development of the foot, but the task of obtaining these can be cumbersome and time-intensive. An automated method for obtaining a series of angle measurements and bony relationships, which can eventually be used to characterize foot deformities, should improve the radiologists’ workflow.

For our use case(s), we will first focus on automating the measurement of a series of different angles and bony associations on foot radiographs, which can then be compiled to determine the presence vs. absence of a foot deformity. If present, our hope is for the algorithm to further diagnose/characterize the specific foot deformity. Ultimately, this may be expanded to include additional modalities, such as CT.

For this particular use case, we will limit our evaluation to measuring the talus-first metatarsal (Meary’s) angle on lateral weight bearing foot radiographs, which is one method that can be used to evaluate for pes planus or pes cavus deformity. Additional use cases include the AP talo-calcaneal and lateral talo-calcaneal angles, intermetatarsal angle, talo-1st metatarsal angle, 1st metatarsophalangeal angle, tibial-calcaneal angle, talonavicular axis and calcaneal pitch.

Narrative(s)

3 year-old female presents to the pediatrician with abnormal gait and in-toeing.  Bilateral, weight-bearing 3-view foot radiographs are obtained for evaluation of foot deformities.

6month-old male presents for contractures/abnormal positioning of the feet. Bilateral, 3-view simulated weight-bearing foot radiographs are obtained for evaluation of foot deformities.

Workflow Description

Radiographs of the foot/feet are ordered, obtained, sent to PACS and the algorithm is triggered.

The algorithm delivers the following outputs: talus-first metatarsal (Meary’s) angle, normal vs. abnormal angle, and severity of the deformity.


Considerations for Dataset Development


Procedures

{X-ray, Foot Radiograph, Foot}

View(s)

{Lateral}

Age

[0,18]

Sex at Birth

{Male, Female}

Technique

{Weight-bearing, Simulated weight-bearing, Erect}

Anatomy  {Foot}

Confounding Variables

{Cast, Splint, Brace, Non-weight bearing, Supine, AP, AP Supine}

Technical Specifications


Inputs

DICOM Study

Procedure

X-ray, Foot Radiograph

Views

Lateral

Data Type

DICOM

Modality

X-ray

Body Region

Lower Extremity

Anatomic Focus

Foot


Primary Outputs

Meary’s Angle

RadElement ID

RDE1583

Definition

The angle between a line drawn from the centers of the longitudinal axes of the talus and the first metatarsal on weight-bearing lateral foot radiograph.

Data Type

Numeric

Value Set

0-90

Units

Degrees


Secondary Outputs 

Normal vs. Abnormal Meary’s Angle

RadElement ID

RDE1584

Definition

Normal for Meary’s angle is 0 to 4 degrees.

Data Type

Categorical

Value Set

  • normal (0-4 degrees)

  • abnormal (>4 degrees convex upward)

  • abnormal (>4 degrees convex downward)

Units

N/A


Convexity of Meary’s Angle

RadElement ID

RDE1585

Definition

Meary’s angle (in degrees) can be used to determine pes planus or pes cavus, based on the convexity (down or up, respectively).

Data Type

Categorical

Value Set

  • Normal (0-4)

  • Pes Planus (>4 degrees convexity downward)

  • Pes Cavus (>4 degrees convexity upward)

Units

N/A

Future Development Ideas


As mentioned in the Value Proposition, future development ideas include

  • Additional angle measurements

  • Bony relationships in the foot

  • Diagnosis of foot deformities if present (“diagnostic use cases”)

  • Improvement from prior studies if comparisons are available

  • Extrapolation to another imaging modality, such as CT