Quantifying Carotid Stenosis on CTA

Purpose

To accurately assess the maximum degree of proximal carotid stenosis on CTA neck.

Tag(s)

 

Panel

Neuroradiology
Define-AI ID 21020022

Originator

Mark Lum
Lead Mark Lum

Panel Chair

Alex Norbash

Panel Reviewers

Neuoradiology Panel

License

Creative Commons 4.0
Status Public Comment
RadElement Set RDES187

Clinical Implementation


Value Proposition


Accurate quantification of carotid stenosis is important in determining therapy such as endarterectomy. Estimation of stenosis on CTA involves submillimeter measurements (Barlett 2006), which are prone to manual measurement variability. Additionally, tortuosity or obliquity of the internal carotid arteries can make perpendicular measurements challenging further limiting accurate stenosis estimation.

Narrative(s)


60 year-old male with hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and coronary artery disease presents with intermittent transient vision loss. CTA of the neck reveals severe left carotid artery stenosis.

Workflow Description



The proximal internal carotid arteries are automatically segmented, and elongated, curved reconstructions are generated (centerline technique). Annotated images demonstrate the minimal luminal diameter reported to the tenth of a millimeter. Estimated stenosis is automatically produced based on established normative data.


Considerations for Dataset Development



Procedure

CTA neck

Age

>=18 years

Sex

Male, female

Co-morbidities

Hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoking, obesity, diabetes

Technical Specifications


Inputs

 

DICOM Study

Procedure

CTA neck

Views

All

Data Type

DICOM

Modality

CT

Body Region

Neck

Anatomic Focus

Neck



Primary Outputs


Maximum carotid stenosis

RadElement ID

RDE1272

Definition

Greatest degree of stenosis of the proximal cervical internal carotid artery

Data Type

Numeric

Value Set

[0,100]

Units

Percent


References


Bartlett ES, Walters TD, Symons SP, Fox AJ. Quantification of carotid stenosis on CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27(1):13-9.